| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:[Rubicon] Electronic Attack Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: CCP never makes a specialized ship to be GOOD solo. I think that is the point. It's specialized. Meaning it does one or two things really well and by extension, is not very good at anything else. So you *could* use a sp...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2013.10.11 16:54:00
|
2. FW: Not just frigates and destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Shahai Shintaro wrote: I've always disliked the require largest ship to run a timer idea. First, please define largest ship. For a small which is larger, a T2 frig or a destroyer? Based on your answer to the previous question, should I require ...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2013.05.16 10:53:00
|
3. FW: Not just frigates and destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Faction warfare is probably 80% frigates and destroyers, with a few cruisers every so often. Plus a bunch of missioning bombers. I would like to see a reason to use more larger ships. I suggest two things: 1. A more even spread of plex sizes. ...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2013.05.15 16:55:00
|
4. Noobcorp highsec safety switch and biomassing pirate alts - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mag's wrote: Why would forcing new players in NPC corps into low and null, be a good idea? Also why should people have to leave an NPC corp, to engage in high sec? The idea is not to force anyone into low or null. Players can just as easily...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2013.03.15 14:17:00
|
5. Noobcorp highsec safety switch and biomassing pirate alts - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ok, here's my reasoning. Quote: 1. Members of noobcorps shouldn't be able to engage in highsec (safety always on) Most importantly, it should help encourage new players wanting to become pirates to join player corps and experience more of t...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2013.03.14 17:57:00
|
6. Noobcorp highsec safety switch and biomassing pirate alts - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why?
- by Axl Borlara - at 2013.03.14 17:24:00
|
7. Noobcorp highsec safety switch and biomassing pirate alts - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
1. Members of noobcorps shouldn't be able to engage in highsec (safety always on) 2. You shouldn't be able to biomass an alt with negative sec Discuss
- by Axl Borlara - at 2013.03.14 17:08:00
|
8. Sticky:FW: rebalancing NPCs and you - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Lili Lu wrote: It will still result in HAC, Recon, and tech II logi gangs stomping on any tech I ships that might want to enter. This is fine out in the open. But that has been one of the great things about FW plexe restric...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.11.26 17:30:00
|
9. Sticky:FW: rebalancing NPCs and you - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Generally sounds really good. With capture buttons (and definitely the capture range) being right on the warp-in beacon, won't all plex fights just be close range blapping? Also, did I miss anything on whether a timer will count back down if no ...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.08.31 17:15:00
|
10. Sticky:FW: I-hub and system upgrades - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Also, docking rights are the single most important change relating to 'ownership' of a system. It should stay as a consequence of system control rather than just upgrades. Otherwise it's back to boring station games again.
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.08.31 17:00:00
|
11. Sticky:FW: I-hub and system upgrades - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sounds promising. One idea that I haven't thought through at all. When a system flips, would it make more sense for it to stay at vulnerable status but with different owners? Say, Amarr hold Kamela. It gets plexed up to 100% vulnerable. Minmatar...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.08.31 16:55:00
|
12. Sticky:FW: I-hub and system upgrades - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm not quite sure how yet, but there should be more benefits the longer you continuously hold control of a given system.
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.08.29 16:33:00
|
13. Sticky:FW: rebalancing NPCs and you - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
That's encouraging, except that some things need fixing ASAP. A few relatively minor changes *now* that remove the bulk of the farmers will be enough to keep people happy and still involved in FW until the rest of the fixes come along.
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.08.29 16:28:00
|
14. Sticky:FW: rebalancing NPCs and you - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: And for the record, NPC's that de-agress upon enemy player entry is my absolute favorite solution to a lot of these issues. If the timer stopped and the NPC's deaggressed whenever a player warped in, we could have ou...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.08.28 17:05:00
|
15. Sticky:FW: rebalancing NPCs and you - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I've only read the last couple of pages, so I may have missed things... NPCs Required in plexs to avoid gun-less plex farming Need to be killed to avoid gun-less plex farming (may include *low* hp structures as well as ships) Fairly easy to kill ...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.08.23 17:07:00
|
16. Sticky:FW: rebalancing NPCs and you - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thaddeus Rees wrote: What annoys me most about Npc's in offensive factional warfare complexes, is that to tank them in a frigate I need to swap out for a PvE fitted ship. Which size plexes are you tanking in a PVE fit frigate? And what is th...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.06.25 16:23:00
|
17. Removing NPC's from Factional warfare complexes. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thaddeus Rees wrote: Conversly, if I am offensively plexing in caldari controlled systems (where I am forced to use a PvE fitted ship to tank the NPC's) ~ I have no desire to fight using a fail-fit so I warp off as soon as anyone lands on grid...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.06.22 16:16:00
|
18. Sticky:FW: rebalancing NPCs and you - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Shooting the NPC's really shouldn't take much effort even now. I mean, given a reasonable amount and type of PVP fitted ships for the plex size, it's not exactly difficult to kill them. Solo killing all major plex NPC's in a thrasher is, and shou...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.06.21 16:54:00
|
19. Review the Faction War plex mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How about cutting plex LP by half and doubling PVP LP rewards? Less incentive to plex for LP, as opposed to plex for system sovereignty. More incentive to PVP.
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.06.20 16:28:00
|
20. Review the Faction War plex mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aktonn wrote: 1) Faction NPC have capacity to warp scramble. That would make things almost impossible for an attacker. Attacker gets scrammed in plex by NPCs. Defender comes along Attacker sits back and waits to die Quote: 2) Warp in...
- by Axl Borlara - at 2012.06.20 16:26:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |